Sunday, 29 November 2020    HomeAbout UsContact Us     

You are here: Home / Contemporary / Darwinism and Atheism
Usamah Hasan, Darwinism, Evolutionary Forces and the Creation of Man - Part 8: Recommended Letter of Tawbah
Filed under: Darwinism and Atheism
Thursday, February 03 2011 - by Abu.Iyaad
Key topics: Darwinism Evolution

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

Monkeying Around...

This is what was posted on the masjid noticeboard recently:

This should really read:

I believe in my version of the account of the creation of Aadam which treats Darwinism as the ultimate, authoritative truth and the Qur'an as a subservient, "children's madrasah level", "needing extra qualification and sophistication" truth and which left as it is, is for backward, narrow-minded Muslims. However, since my kufr has been plainly exposed by both scholar and non-scholar alike, and rejected by all Muslims of sound fitrah and aql, I am left with no choice but to rage in my cage by asserting an ambiguous generalized belief, with generalized ambiguous words as a last-ditch attempt to deceive and hoodwink the congregation and wider audience about the reality of my kufr.

Biologists say, after extensive observational studies, that monkeys are proven to have a basic moral sense, and they even mourn over their dead apparently. We can only hope to appeal to this basic moral sense, and advise Usamah (and his father) that a detailed tawbah is what is required.

Usamah is forgetting the fact that although we are on opposite sides of the bars, he's on the inside and the rest of us are on the outside, watching, in amazement and bewilderment at how a monkey can start raging in the cage given what has transpired. Its the last ditch attempt of a fatally wounded animal. Whatever the case, Usamah's case is over and done with ...

More important and more grave is the issue of the father who has long been touted as a "scholar", allegedly on a par with the well-known genuine, firmly-rooted Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah. We had deluded ignoramuses stating that Suhaib Hasan is the highest authority in da'wah in the UK because he is an independent scholar of the land. Looks like these people weren't around in the mid and late 90s when the dodgy fatwas of the "House of Hasan" were routinely destroying families and marriages up and down the country and were surprisingly common-knowledge back then even to lay people. And that's peanuts compared to his misguidance in ta'aawun and mu'aamalah with the worst of Ahl al-Bid'ah, and his actions in this regard have buffered many a truth-seeker from arriving at the true and real way of the Salaf, and instead stuck in a "no-man's land" where Ikhwani, Bannaawi principles run circles around them and their perceptions of the da'wah. But what a lengthy fraud this has been, it took 13 years for it to be realized, even after Shaykh Muqbil ordered the boycotting of this man way back in 1997 or thereabouts for these same reasons. It finished very ugly on Saturday 22/01/2011 when Suhaib Hasan's public relations stunt for his son backfired badly. This fraud lasted that long because groups of mostly well-intentioned but uninformed people up and down the country were deceived by treacherous (and not so well-intentioned) graduates having their own wider goals and designs. They raised Suhaib Hasan, supported him and joined his side of the line despite knowing the rulings of the Scholars upon him and his da'wah. Nay, even after they saw him side by side with callers to Shirk and deniers of al-Uluww, Jahmite Sufi grave worshippers in the recent past. The unhealthy and excessive rank hatred being harboured by these graduates (and their followers) towards others prevented them from siding with the truth, even though it was plain and obvious, on the tips of their noses, in front of their very eyes. It's an ugly finish, but a befitting one given the circumstances. We wonder what types of diplomacy and efforts will be made in the background to defend this man now and to save his face and make light his affair...

A Recommended Tawbah

This is what Usamah should be writing and posting on masjid noticeboards and this is what Suhaib Hasan should be encouraging his son with, if he truly is a concerned father:

Dear Muslims in UK and elsewhere:

I hereby announce my open, unequivocal tawbah from an instance of kufr that emanated from me and not least, the great turmoil I have created for the local community and and Muslims in general after having been taken for a ride by Western Materialist philosophies that are fundamentally opposed to fitrah and aql.


  • I've realized that Darwinian Evolution is an academic and intellectual con which cannot be conferred "scientific status" by the very demarcation criteria used by materialists and naturalists to distinguish between "science" and "non-science."

  • I've realized that natural selection acting on random mutations is a children's madrasah level account of the great diversity and complexity of life. It is the only other explanation atheists managed to pull out of their posteriors to combat the one that is necessitated by fitrah and aql. In other words there are really only two answers. Either matter creates (and it does so randomly of course) or an all-knowing, all-powerful entity creates, one to whom all affairs return to. However, rather than saying "matter creates itself and self-organizes randomly" which all people with sound fitrah and aql reject as absurd through uniform experience in all history, it's clothed as "natural selection acting on random mutations." Fundamentally, the core of neo-Darwinism is an insult to fitrah and aql.

  • I've realized that the fossil record on the whole clashes with Darwinian Evolution, and Darwin admitted it himself, in the Origin of Species, writing,

    The number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed on the earth, [must] be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graded organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.

    Things have not changed much since then. Proposing a "common ancestor" is not an explanation through "natural law", it is simply a hypothetical assertion used to do the explaining of the observed fossil record. This is not "science" according to the demarcation criteria which requires that a theory is explained by natural law. The theory of "common ancestor" is an explanation through a hypothetical, not through natural law.

  • I also acknowledge that in the days of Darwin, the idea of a cell was that it was a minute piece of jelly, pretty much. Of course, primitive understandings lead to primitive theories. Fast forward more than a 100 years after Darwin and the idea of cells and the knowledge of DNA opens up a vast world of unfathomable complexity. It has still not been fully deciphered. Only now are they discovering molecular machines with amazing complexity involved at every level of the cells operation. In retrospect, this shows that a primitive idea like Darwin's should never have seen the light of day. But unfortunately it did. And suckers are born every minute. More and more people (even if they are an outcast minority) are mustering to challenge Darwin's primitive theory because the knowledge of cell and molecular biology was unknown then, and they had a very simplistic idea of how cells formed from minerals and water. We now know that those who research into "origins of life" science, as in abiogenesis, have absolutely no answer to account for the amazing complexity of the simplest single-cell organism. Since, the strength of Darwin's theory relies upon the strength of the evidence and explanation for the actual origin of life, then Darwin's theory becomes even more suspect.

Upon all of the above considerations - meaning, in retrospect, such a theory should never have seen the light of day and gained currency in the first place, such that a deluded Muslim like me should come along, develop an inferiority complex in the face of the rigorous and militant promotion of this theory (in the academic environments that I have passed through) and become deceived into thinking there is a need to merge the Qur'an with it - I say the following:

  • Trying to reconcile an unproven, imaginary theory with the Qur'anic texts is imbecilic on my behalf. It appears I was deceived by the false authority I thought my secular ijaazah's gave me. They amounted to nothing in the end, as I got taken for a ride nevertheless. Muslim scholars and the average Muslim are not as backward and ill-informed as I deceived myself into thinking they were no thanks to my inferiority complex in the face of militant Darwinists that appear to dominate the corridors of educational establishments.

  • I understand definitions and ideas about "science" are deliberately defined and steered in a direction to favour a materialistic outlook and naturalistic world view, and that certain truths which can be known by objective scientific enquiry are sidelined and marginalized by these rigged definitions because they clash with that world view. As a result, a contrived consensus can be claimed within academic establishments, and this is rigorously defended because the stakes are high. Along come coconuts like me, we get exposed to this environment and get deluded by that fake display of objective scientific enquiry (in those areas that we are discussing) and that contrived consensus. A stretch of a few years like this and next thing you know we are now "in the house" whilst everyone remains "in the field" and we start looking down on those uneducated peasants with an air of arrogance.

  • Now that I have come to my senses, I believe that Allaah created Aadam exactly as described in the Qur'an, that Aadam was the first human, there being no human prior to him. That he was granted reason, choice, language and so on after being created. I believe all of mankind are descended from Aadam (alayhis salaam). I specifically reject and deny that he was born of parents that resembled humans or anything like this. I believe that the uniformity and homology in living things is simply an indication of a sole, masterful creator, that the originator is one, and that "common descent" is simply a materialistic interpretation adopted so as to combat fitrah and aql.

  • I affirm certain observed realities that can be incorporated into the vague and general term "Evolution" (such as adaptability, phenotypical change etc.), and I realize that Evolution can mean many things. But I reject and deny that particular meaning of it which claims man came to be through Darwinian processes (from a single cell to intermediate stages to apes to man) and deny any claims that this is how Allaah created man, as this directly clashes with revealed texts, and is not a matter open to interpretation to unfounded, unproven theories. Specifically I speak with the verses (22:5, 20:55, 15:26, 55:14, 38:75) upon the explanations found in the well-known books of exegesis, those of al-Tabari, Ibn Katheer, al-Baghawi, al-Qurtubi and others, and upon the consensus of the Muslim scholars and I repudiate all attempts to justify Darwinian theory through vague and obscure statements of the Mu'tazilah, Ismaa'eelee Baatiniyyah, Sufi Ittihaadees and others.

Finally, I repent (and apologise) for all the inconvenience and turmoil I have created for the congregation over the years and I endeavour to start learning true and real knowledge of the deen from its orthodox sources.

Signed: _______________________ Date: ___________

In the presence of:

Witness 1: ________________________________

Witness 2: ________________________________

Print, Sign and Distribute...

Its not comprehensive but at least it's a start. Usamah ought to print this off, sign and distribute openly and widely. Daddy should also give him a helping hand, because the one who helped propagate baatil should be foremost in trying to erase it. This is what should be going up on noticeboards, not expressions of unsophisticated wild rage...

Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.

Site Categories
Belief in Allaah
Belief in the Angels
Belief in Revealed Books
Belief in the Messengers
Belief in the Last Day
Belief in the Divine Decree
Belief in the Unseen
Faith and Disbelief
The Prophet's Companions
Rulers and Rulership
The Innovators
The Signs of the Last Hour
Latest Articles
Disbelief of the One Who Denies Sun's Motion Around the Earth
A Brief Biography of Harb bin Ismail al-Kirmani (d. 280H)
Abu Uthman al-Sabuni (d. 449H): The Distinguishing Signs of Ahl al-Bid'ah
Muhammad Hijab, the Falasifah, Mutafalsifah and Jahmiyyah: Laying the Foundations for the Dīn of the Philosophers and Jahmites
Abu Taymiyyah Jeylani's Student and the Principle of Jahm bin Safwaan
The Difference Between Ru'yah, Idraak and Ihaatah with Respect to Seeing Allaah
Big Bang Cosmology and the Quran: A Response to Muslim Apologists Using Scientific Conjectures to Explain the Qur'an
The Permanent Committee of Scholars on Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahl al-Kalām and Tasalsul (Endless Chain of Events)
Shaykh Ibn al-Uthaymin and Ibn Taymiyyah on the Hadiths Relating to the First Creation
Advice Regarding Hamza Tzortzis and Company (iERA): Part 5 - The Origins of Space, Time and Matter in the View of the Jahmites
You Want to Learn Arabic? try this website
Search This Site

 Other Websites

Most Popular
The Meaning and Importance of 'Aqidah'
The Khilaafah Lasted for 30 Years Then There Was Kingship Which Allaah Gives To Whomever He Pleases
The Splitting of the Muslim Ummah: Part 1 - The Completion and Perfection of the Religion and The Way of the Companions
Advice Regarding Hamza Tzortzis and Company (iERA): Part 1 - Introduction
The Splitting of the Muslim Ummah: Part 3 - An Overview of the Various Deviant Sects and Corrupt Creeds and Methodologies
Muhammad Hijab, the Falasifah, Mutafalsifah and Jahmiyyah: Laying the Foundations for the Dīn of the Philosophers and Jahmites
Want to Understand Aqidah Properly? Then You Must Learn and Understand History!
Imaam al-Sa'dee: What is the Definition of Tawheed and What Are Its Types?
Translation of the Laamiyyah Poem Ascribed to Ibn Taymiyyah
The Splitting of the Muslim Ummah: Part 2 - The Emergence of the Sects and the Heads of Misguidance

ض abdul-ghaniyy al-maqdisi abdul-majeed az-zindani abdul-qadir al-jeelaanee abdullaah bin zubayr al-humaidee abu bakr al-isma'ili abu bakr al-ismaa'eelee abu hanifah abu ja'far al-tawahi abu yusuf abul-hasan alee ad-daraqutnee accounting ad-daraqutni ahl ul-kitaab ahmad ahmad bin hanbal ahmad ibn hanbal al-bannah al-barbahaaree al-fawzaan al-hisaab al-humaidi al-humaydee al-ikhwaan al-muslimeen al-istiwaa al-jihah al-laalikaa'ee al-mareesee al-meezaan al-qadaa wal-qadar al-qadar al-qusree al-sa'dee al-uluww al-walaa wal-baraa allaah's speech an-najmee aqidah ar-radd alal-jahmiyyah as-siraat asbaab assim al-hakeem astronomy atheism atheists barbahaaree barbahari belief in allaah bid'ah big bang bishr bridge companions cosmology creation creed daniel dennet darwinism disbelief divine decree early ash'aris eemaan endless chain evolution faith faith in allaah fawzan firaq gospel hamza tzortzis harb hisaab history ibn abee duwaad ibn battah al-ukbaree ibn dirham ibn safwaan ibn taymiyyah iera iftiraaq ihsaan ikhwaan imaam ahmad imaan imam mahdi injeel innovations innovators irjaa' islaam ismaa'eel bin yahyaa al-muzanee ja'd jahm jahmiyyah jihah kalam cosmological argument khilaafah kingship kirmani kufr kullaabiyyah laamiyyah ibn taymiyyah magians mahdi majoos meezaan moon travel mu'tazilah muhammad hijab new atheists nuzool ordainment people of the book predestination qadar qadariyyah qur'an quran richard dawkins ru'yah sahaabah sam harris scales scrolls sharh us-sunnah sharh usool i'tiqaad sharh usool i'tiqaad ahlis-sunnah wal-jamaa'ah sharh usoolil-i'tiqaad ahlis-sunnah wal-jamaa'ah sharhus-sunnah sifaat siraat suhuf suroor surooree taaloot tableegh tadmuriyyah tafarruq tahaawiyyah tajahhum tasalsul tawheed tawhid tawrat torah twelve khalifahs usool us-sunnah ways and means yasir qadhi yoonus ibn 'ubaid yoonus ibn ubaid zaboor

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012

© Aqidah.Com. All rights reserved.
Maktabah Salafiyyah